Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files
Unused Autologous Blood
Why Is It Not Made Available for General Use?
Liberal eligibility criteria to maximize patient participation
In order to enable as many patients as possible to donate blood for their planned surgery we
deliberately relax the medical eligibility criteria. For example, we lower
the acceptable hemoglobin/hematocrit level and accept persons with serious
medical conditions (e.g., cancer and heart disease) that would ordinarily
disqualify them from donating for general use.
Unexpected conditions diagnosed after
surgery (e.g., cancer) may render a donation unsuitable, requiring a recall
In this situation, if the unit had been designated for general use and transfused to another
person, an FDA-mandated recall would have to be initiated. Because blood
banks would then have to notify recipients of recalled units and their
physicians, and considerable expense and anxiety would result, we feel it
best to have a single uniform set of criteria for donors of blood intended
for general use.
Since most autologous donations are unsuitable for general use,
any savings from releasing these donations for general use would
be outweighed by the administrative costs of subjecting the donors to a full
medical history.
In view of this, and
because these patients are usually making repeated donations over a short
time, we limit the medical history to those questions addressing the safety
of the donor. This reduces the time patients must take to
make their donations.
Safety concerns:
Some patients, fearful
that mention of certain information may disqualify them from donating for
themselves, may not fully disclose their
medical history, thus increasing the possibility their blood
could transmit an infection to others.
Studies of the
incidence of positive test results for
infectious agents show higher rates among autologous donors
than volunteer donors. Since a negative test result may occur in the
presence of infection (= "false-negative"), this higher incidence of
positive test results suggests that their blood may be less safe than that
of volunteer donors.
If autologous blood
were made available for general use, hospitals would have to
maintain two inventories of this
blood. This increases the possibility for erroneous release,
with an unsuitable autologous unit being transfused to another
person.
Legal liability Excluding
unused autologous donations from general use has become
the standard of care
throughout the United States. If a "crossed over"
autologous unit led to disease transmission, legal liability for the
hospital and the physician could be considerable.
(Adapted from a position statement by the Blood Centers
of California, 1994)
ADDENDUM:
Since the above report was developed, both the American Medical Association and the American
Association of Blood Banks have adopted a policy discouraging the "crossover"
of unused autologous blood units to the allogeneic volunteer blood supply.
Reference: Blum, LN et al. Transfusion 1998;38:891-95